
Plan Developed by the Stillwater Tree Board 1995
The following individuals and entities should be recognized for their contributions to the development of this Community Forest Plan:
* OSU Forestry Department, primarily Dr. Tom Hennessey and Dr. Steve Anderson, for obtaining two federal grants (an America the Beautiful and an Urban and Community Forest cost-share grant) which provided funding for a graduate student to assist the Tree Board in the development of this plan. Their ideas and suggestions served as valuable starting points in the writing of this plan
* Shelley Schoenrock, a graduate student of the OSU Foresty Department, for coordination and actual writing of this plan
* Bryan Brown of the Stillwater Community Development Department whose experience in writing such documents served as a valuable guide
* Robert Birchell and Associates for performing the street tree inventory which was used in the development of the tree care program
* Stillwater Tree Board, including all of the various past
and present members and volunteers, who provided input and suggestions
The structure of the Stillwater Tree Board as of July, 1995 is as follows:
Citizen Members:
Tom Hennessey, Chairman
Jack Moore, Vice-Chairman
Helen Gorin
Jim Stiegler
Garry Sites
Bob Bollinger
Steve Hess
City Staff Representatives:
Bryan Brown, Community Development
John McClenny, Parks & Recreations
Jeff Hough, Public Works
Gary Field, Utilities Authority
An urban, or community, forest is defined as all trees and associated
vegetation in an urban area. This includes street trees, trees and vegetation located in
parks and on other public property, private residential and commercial trees, and
undeveloped forested areas. Recent surveys have shown that most community forests
nationwide are declining. Improper management is the main cause of this decline. Proper management is essential for survival of the community forest,
and is the essence of urban forestry.
An inventory of Stillwater's community forest was conducted in the fall of 1991. It covered 5.5 square miles of Stillwater's main urban area and focused on public street trees. The information from the inventory revealed that Stillwater's community forest is in a state of decline. This is the result of several factors: tree planting efforts have not kept up with historical efforts that established the current urban forest; removals have exceeded new plantings in many areas; disease and urban development are causing a loss of urban canopy. The greatest factor in decline, however, is probably old age of the community forest. This becomes of greater significance when dead trees are not replaced. A long-term management plan is needed to improve the safety, health and longevity of the community forest. Since this will require a long-term commitment of scarce dollars, a carefully planned, comprehensive approach to tree care is essential.
THE MASTER COMMUNITY FOREST PLAN
The Stillwater Tree Board is currently developing a comprehensive urban
forestry program that will help attain the vision (see section entitled
Vision Statement) for the community forest. Several accomplishments have been made
that have contributed to a successful start to the program:
Although the urban forestry program has had a successful start, it has not addressed
some important community forest issues:
This Master Community Forest Plan is part of the comprehensive program in that it
documents long-term plans for the community forest. It applies to street trees only, but
the comprehensive program applies to all urban trees through educational means. As with the basics of any long
range plan, this plan includes a "mission" or "vision" statement, defines goals and
objectives, and identifies strategies that will help attain the objectives. Specific
information about the Stillwater Tree Board and the urban forestry program will probably
be integrated in a separate `handbook'. The document will most likely include:
A rough draft of this handbook has already been written, and the Tree Board should
ensure that the document is completed and updated on a regular basis.
The Stillwater Tree Board believes that a healthy urban forest will contribute to Stillwater's economic development. A healthy urban forest enhances the visual and environmental quality of the community, which, in turn, provides an attractive location for businesses, residents, and visitors. Tree board members agree that a healthy urban forest is one that has a high species diversity, has a variety of ages, is safe for people and property, requires low maintenance, and has all planting spaces full. With this in mind, the Tree Board developed a vision statement:
"We, the citizens of Stillwater, envision a healthy urban forest that enhances the visual and environmental quality of Stillwater, and that contributes to its economic development"
The Stillwater Tree Board has identified three broad goals consistent with the vision statement. These goals and their associated objectives, and strategies (actions) to help accomplish the objectives, are explained and listed below. These lists are by no means complete. The possibilities are endless.
1. Develop a Tree Management Program
The purpose of a tree management program is to establish as healthy a
community forest as is possible. As mentioned in the section entitled Vision
Statement, the Tree Board defines a healthy urban forest as one that has a high
species diversity, has a variety of ages, is safe for people and property, requires low
maintenance, and has all planting spaces full. Three objectives were identified to help
achieve this goal and are listed below (strategies for achieving each objective are listed
underneath):
2. Provide Educational Information
As mentioned in the Introduction, this Community Forest Plan applies to
public trees directly, and applies to private trees indirectly through educational means. The Tree Board, therefore, will
serve as an educator and consultant on urban
trees and their management for the community. This information will help develop a healthy
forest throughout the community since it will provide citizens with the means to care for
their portion of the urban forest themselves. It will also demonstrate the value of urban
trees which will help build community support for the urban forestry program. Four
objectives were identified to help accomplish this goal which are listed below (strategies
for achieving the objectives are listed underneath):
The Tree Board should ensure that its members keep their knowledge of trees and related
subjects up to date so they may be of valuable assistance to the community. Such knowledge
can include but is not limited to:
The Tree Board can keep the knowledge of its members current in many ways:
3. Develop Support For An Urban Forestry Program Development of an urban forestry program requires long-term planning
(anywhere from 5 to 25 years or more). It also requires a significant amount of resources
to implement. Stillwater, like most cities, is
not able to support such a program by monetary means alone. This does not mean that an
urban forestry program cannot be established in the community. It means that Stillwater must rely on the motivation and
creativity of it's citizens to develop additional means of supporting the program. The
Tree Board has already demonstrated, through it's Pioneer Grove planting project, that the
citizens of Stillwater are eager to do so. The
following three objectives and associated strategies will help the Tree Board build
support for the urban forestry program throughout the community:
Monetary support can be obtained the following ways but is not limited to: Community volunteers can provide the majority of support for tree board projects and
activities, thereby reducing monetary costs. Such a network can include but is not limited
to: A network of volunteers can be assembled through contacts that the Tree Board makes
during interactions with the community. Such interaction can include but is not limited
to: Public relations `partners' can help circulate announcements, advertisements, and educational materials thereby reducing monetary
costs. Such a network can include but is not limited to: Considerations for accomplishing these goals are discussed in the section entitled
Implementation. The previous section discussed the three main goals that the Stillwater
Tree Board has set for itself: development of a tree management program, providing educational information, and developing support for
an urban forestry program. All three are highly interconnected. For example, planting projects will attract community volunteers, furthering the tree management program, while
simultaneously building community networks. Tree Board members, volunteers, and the community as a whole will learn from the
experience. Organizing volunteer networks throughout the community and building other support
systems for an urban forestry program takes a considerable amount of time. Providing
education to tree board members and the community is an ongoing process. The Tree Board
and its volunteers should therefore focus initial efforts on
developing a sound tree management program. A tree management program will provide two
important functions:
THE TREE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Removals: Removal of dead and hazardous trees is a continual process, and should be
accompanied with replacement plantings. Proper maintenance of existing trees will slow the
amount of removals needed in the future. Planting: Available planting spaces originate from three sources: spaces in existence at the time
of inventory, spaces created by removal of dead trees, and spaces created by removal of
hazardous trees. Table 2 below shows the number of planting spaces
that will be available throughout the five year initiation period. Maintenance: ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PLANS Year 1: Year 2: Year 3: Year 4: Year 5: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PLANS Annual work plans were structured to create annual budgets that would increase with
each year. This would provide time to develop the necessary monetary and volunteer support
for the urban forestry program. Objectives for each yearly operational plan are summarized
in table 19 below. The most important objective for the initial tree management program is to create a
safer community forest. All dead trees found during the inventory are therefore removed
during the first year. All hazardous trees (those given a condition rating of 5 to 30
percent during the inventory) are removed throughout the remaining 4 years. The same
number of trees that are removed are replaced each year to ensure continuation of the
community forest. Available spaces are also filled each year to expand the community
forest. A summary of the hazardous tree removals are shown in table 20. Trees with the lowest condition rating can be considered the `most' hazardous.
Hazardous removals therefore start with the lowest rated trees and successively remove
higher rated trees the following years. Objectives for years 4 and 5 are to remove all
trees with a condition rating of 30 percent. Removals for each of these years were
structured to create the yearly increase in the overall budget for the initial 5 year
program (see Summary of Annual Budgets above). Created by Wendy Robinson
A tree management program should set goals for the three basic needs of the community
forest: planting, maintenance, and removal. Annual work plans that outline tasks to
accomplish these goals, and associated budgets, should be documented in Annual
Operational Plans. Suggested goals for initiating a tree management program for
Stillwater's community forest are discussed below. Annual operational plans are also
suggested, and are structured to accomplish the initial phase within a five year period.
Cost estimates for developing annual operational plans are
difficult to determine, but are quite high. Estimates vary widely depending on whether
work is done in-house or is contracted, size and species of trees involved, amount of work
required, amount of work accomplished through monetary means versus volunteer
means, and many more factors. The following assumptions were made in development of the
annual budgets below:
As discussed in the Introduction, Stillwater's community forest is in
a state of decline. Many trees have died or have declined to a hazardous state (condition
rating of 30 percent or less in the tree inventory) due to old age and/or lack of
maintenance. These trees need to be removed for safety and aesthetic reasons. Dead trees
need to be removed immediately, and hazardous trees should be removed on a planned
schedule thereafter. The total number of trees that need to be removed are shown in Table 1 below.
TREE SIZE
# DEAD TREES
# HAZARDOUS TREES
TOTAL # TREES
< 24"
42
207
249
24" TO 36"
9
87
96
> 36"
2
10
12
TOTALS:
53
304
357
Many spaces are available for tree planting. Planting projects should emphasize species
diversification, and should aim to have each species comprise no more than 10 percent
of the total tree population. They should also aim to plant at least the same
number of trees that are removed. This will help ensure that the community forest is
continually rejuvenated. It is critical that proper planting locations be identified since
interference with utility lines is the foremost general maintenance and safety problem.
Public educational programs are essential to reducing this conflict.
SPACE ORIGIN
# DEAD TREES
DEAD TREE REMOVALS
53
HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVALS
304
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE SPACES
5,295
TOTAL:
5,652
Urban tree maintenance includes watering the first few years after planting and during dry
seasons, pruning for strong structure and to remove deadwood, spraying for insects and/or
disease when needed, and fertilizing when needed. A comprehensive maintenance schedule
extends the life and improves the safety of urban trees. The inventory indicates that
Stillwater's community forest has not been properly maintained. Almost 75 percent of the
trees inventoried have not had deadwood removed, and almost 50 percent of the trees have
been improperly pruned. Over 11 percent are interfering with utility lines which
poses a considerable hazard. Maintenance should begin immediately after trees are
planted and should continue throughout the life of the trees.
Following are suggested annual operational plans for initiating a tree management program
in Stillwater over a five-year period. Each annual plan outlines work objectives and
associated budgets for the year. The costs used in the tables are estimates as such
costs vary widely depending on several factors: tree type, size, location, health, and
more. Removal costs are supplied by the Stillwater Parks and Recreation Department.
Planting and maintenance costs are supplied by Cox Landscape Company Inc. (a
private landscape company in Tulsa), and provide for the planting of a 2-inch balled and
burlapped tree with complete maintenance (watering, pruning, spraying and fertilizing) of
the tree for 2 years following planting. The estimate provided by this company was used to
determine annual budgets since it seems to be the only local organization that could
provide a representative cost per tree for both planting and maintenance. Stump
removal costs were determined using an estimate of $3 per inch in diameter (taken from
"Removing Stumps", Grounds Maintenance, 1991). One representative
diameter from each size category was used to calculate stump removal costs: 24 inches, 30
inches, and 36 inches.
The primary objective for year 1 should be to remove all of the dead trees and fill the
spaces created with replacement trees. This would mean that 53 trees would be removed and
the same number of replacement trees would be planted. In addition, trees should be
planted in currently available spaces. The annual plan provides for filling 1,059
currently available spaces. This number was determined by dividing the total number of
available planting spaces by 5 years so that the same number of spaces are filled each
year
TREE SIZE
# TREES
REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE)
STUMP RMVL ($ PER TREE)
TOTAL COST ($)
< 24"
42
250
72
13,524
24" to 36"
9
350
90
3,960
> 36"
2
750
108
1,716
TOTALS:
53
19,200
SPACE ORIGIN
# TREES
COST PER TREE ($)
TOTAL COST ($)
Dead Tree Removal
53
175
9,275
Available Spaces
1,059
175
185,325
TOTALS:
1,112
194,600
REMOVAL COSTS
$19,200
PLANTING COSTS
194,600
TOTAL:
$213,800
Objectives for year two should be to start removal of hazardous trees, plant in spaces
created by these removals, and fill more currently available planting spaces. The tree
inventory defines hazardous trees as those with a condition rating between 5 and 30
percent. A rating of 0 percent indicates the tree is dead while a condition rating of 100
percent indicates the tree is in the best possible health and condition. Hazardous tree
removals for this year include those with a condition rating of 5 to 15 percent since
these could be viewed as the most hazardous. According to tree inventory data, 35 trees
fall into this category. The resulting operational plan for year 2 is shown in the
following tables.
TREE SIZE
# TREES
REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE)
STUMP RMVL. ($ PER TREE)
TOTAL COST ($)
< 24"
22
250
72
7,084
24" to 36"
11
350
90
4,840
> 36"
2
750
108
1,716
TOTALS:
35
13,640
SPACE ORIGIN
# TREES
COST PER TREE ($)
TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls
35
175
6,125
Available Spaces
1,059
175
185,325
TOTALS:
1,195
191,450
REMOVAL COSTS
$13,640
PLANTING COSTS
$191,450
TOTAL:
$205,090
Objectives for year 3 are to remove more of the hazardous trees, plant in spaces created
by these removals, and fill more currently available spaces. Hazardous tree removals for
this year include those with a condition rating of 20 to 25 percent. A total of 76 trees
fall into this category. Therefore, 76 replacement trees will be planted as well as 1,059
to fill more available spaces. Operational plans for this year are shown in the following
tables.
TREE SIZE
# TREES
REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE)
STUMP REMOVAL ($ PER TREE)
TOTAL COST ($)
< 24"
55
250
72
17,710
24" to 36"
14
350
90
6,160
> 36"
7
750
108
6,006
TOTALS:
76
29,876
SPACE ORIGIN
# TREES
COST PER TREE ($)
TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls
76
175
13,300
Available Spaces
1,059
175
185,325
TOTALS:
1,134
198,625
REMOVAL COSTS
$29,876
PLANTING COSTS
$198,625
TOTAL:
$228,501
Objectives for year 4 should be to continue removal of hazardous trees, replacement of
trees removed, and filling of available planting spaces. Hazardous removals include 97
trees with a condition rating of 30 percent. The resulting annual plan is shown in the
following tables.
TREE SIZE
# TREES
REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE)
STUMP REMOVAL ($ PER TREE)
TOTAL COST ($)
< 24"
95
250
72
30,590
24" to 36"
0
350
90
0
> 36"
2
750
108
1,716
TOTALS:
97
32,306
SPACE ORIGIN
# TREES
COST PER TREE ($)
TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls
97
175
16,975
Available Spaces
1,059
175
185,325
TOTALS:
1,132
202,300
REMOVAL COSTS
$32,306
PLANTING COSTS
$202,300
TOTAL:
$234,606
Objectives for the final year are to finish removal of the hazardous trees, to replace
those trees removed, and to finish planting trees in available spaces. Hazardous removals
include 96 trees left with a condition rating of 30 percent. Once again, 1,059 trees will
be planted to fill the remaining available spaces. The annual plan for year 5 is
summarized in the tables below.
TREE SIZE
# TREES
REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE)
STUMP REMOVAL ($ PER TREE)
TOTAL COST ($)
< 24"
26
250
72
8,372
24" to 36"
70
350
90
30,800
> 36"
0
750
108
0
TOTALS:
96
39,172
SPACE ORIGIN
# TREES
COST PER TREE ($)
TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls
96
175
16,800
Available Spaces
1,059
175
185,325
TOTALS:
1,132
202,125
REMOVAL COSTS
$39,172
PLANTING COSTS
$202,125
TOTAL:
$241,297
Summaries of the annual budgets, annual work plans, and hazardous tree removals are
provided in Tables 18 through 20.
COST TYPE
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
YEAR 5
TOTALS
REMOVALS
19,200
13,640
29,876
32,306
39,172
134,194
PLANTINGS
194,600
191,450
198,625
202,300
202,125
989,100
YR TOTALS
213,800
205,090
228,501
234,606
241,297
1,123,294
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
YEAR 5
TOTALS
REMOVALS
357
Dead
53
0
0
0
0
53
Hazardous
0
35
76
97
96
304
TOTALS:
53
35
76
97
96
357
PLANTINGS
Replacement
53
35
76
97
96
357
Available
1,059
1,059
1,059
1,059
1,059
5,295
TOTALS:
1,112
1,094
1,135
1,156
1,155
5,652
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
YEAR 4
YEAR 5
TOTALS
CONDITION (%)
5 - 15
20 - 25
30
30
< 24"
22
55
95
26
198
24" TO 36"
11
14
0
70
95
> 36"
2
7
2
0
11
TOTALS:
35
76
97
96
304