Stillwater's Community Forest Plan



Plan Developed by the Stillwater Tree Board 1995

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

CONTRIBUTORS

The following individuals and entities should be recognized for their contributions to the development of this Community Forest Plan:

* OSU Forestry Department, primarily Dr. Tom Hennessey and Dr. Steve Anderson, for obtaining two federal grants (an America the Beautiful and an Urban and Community Forest cost-share grant) which provided funding for a graduate student to assist the Tree Board in the development of this plan. Their ideas and suggestions served as valuable starting points in the writing of this plan

* Shelley Schoenrock, a graduate student of the OSU Foresty Department, for coordination and actual writing of this plan

* Bryan Brown of the Stillwater Community Development Department whose experience in writing such documents served as a valuable guide

* Robert Birchell and Associates for performing the street tree inventory which was used in the development of the tree care program

* Stillwater Tree Board, including all of the various past and present members and volunteers, who provided input and suggestions

CURRENT TREE BOARD MEMBERS

The structure of the Stillwater Tree Board as of July, 1995 is as follows:

Citizen Members:

Tom Hennessey, Chairman
Jack Moore, Vice-Chairman
Helen Gorin
Jim Stiegler
Garry Sites
Bob Bollinger
Steve Hess

City Staff Representatives:

Bryan Brown, Community Development
John McClenny, Parks & Recreations
Jeff Hough, Public Works
Gary Field, Utilities Authority

INTRODUCTION

COMMUNITY FORESTS

An urban, or community, forest is defined as all trees and associated vegetation in an urban area. This includes street trees, trees and vegetation located in parks and on other public property, private residential and commercial trees, and undeveloped forested areas. Recent surveys have shown that most community forests nationwide are declining. Improper management is the main cause of this decline. Proper management is essential for survival of the community forest, and is the essence of urban forestry.

STILLWATER'S COMMUNITY FOREST

An inventory of Stillwater's community forest was conducted in the fall of 1991. It covered 5.5 square miles of Stillwater's main urban area and focused on public street trees. The information from the inventory revealed that Stillwater's community forest is in a state of decline. This is the result of several factors: tree planting efforts have not kept up with historical efforts that established the current urban forest; removals have exceeded new plantings in many areas; disease and urban development are causing a loss of urban canopy. The greatest factor in decline, however, is probably old age of the community forest. This becomes of greater significance when dead trees are not replaced. A long-term management plan is needed to improve the safety, health and longevity of the community forest. Since this will require a long-term commitment of scarce dollars, a carefully planned, comprehensive approach to tree care is essential.

THE MASTER COMMUNITY FOREST PLAN

The Stillwater Tree Board is currently developing a comprehensive urban forestry program that will help attain the vision (see section entitled Vision Statement) for the community forest. Several accomplishments have been made that have contributed to a successful start to the program:

Although the urban forestry program has had a successful start, it has not addressed some important community forest issues:

This Master Community Forest Plan is part of the comprehensive program in that it documents long-term plans for the community forest. It applies to street trees only, but the comprehensive program applies to all urban trees through educational means. As with the basics of any long range plan, this plan includes a "mission" or "vision" statement, defines goals and objectives, and identifies strategies that will help attain the objectives. Specific information about the Stillwater Tree Board and the urban forestry program will probably be integrated in a separate `handbook'. The document will most likely include:

A rough draft of this handbook has already been written, and the Tree Board should ensure that the document is completed and updated on a regular basis.

VISION STATEMENT

The Stillwater Tree Board believes that a healthy urban forest will contribute to Stillwater's economic development. A healthy urban forest enhances the visual and environmental quality of the community, which, in turn, provides an attractive location for businesses, residents, and visitors. Tree board members agree that a healthy urban forest is one that has a high species diversity, has a variety of ages, is safe for people and property, requires low maintenance, and has all planting spaces full. With this in mind, the Tree Board developed a vision statement:

"We, the citizens of Stillwater, envision a healthy urban forest that enhances the visual and environmental quality of Stillwater, and that contributes to its economic development"

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

The Stillwater Tree Board has identified three broad goals consistent with the vision statement. These goals and their associated objectives, and strategies (actions) to help accomplish the objectives, are explained and listed below. These lists are by no means complete. The possibilities are endless.

1. Develop a Tree Management Program

The purpose of a tree management program is to establish as healthy a community forest as is possible. As mentioned in the section entitled Vision Statement, the Tree Board defines a healthy urban forest as one that has a high species diversity, has a variety of ages, is safe for people and property, requires low maintenance, and has all planting spaces full. Three objectives were identified to help achieve this goal and are listed below (strategies for achieving each objective are listed underneath):

2. Provide Educational Information

As mentioned in the Introduction, this Community Forest Plan applies to public trees directly, and applies to private trees indirectly through educational means. The Tree Board, therefore, will serve as an educator and consultant on urban trees and their management for the community. This information will help develop a healthy forest throughout the community since it will provide citizens with the means to care for their portion of the urban forest themselves. It will also demonstrate the value of urban trees which will help build community support for the urban forestry program. Four objectives were identified to help accomplish this goal which are listed below (strategies for achieving the objectives are listed underneath):

The Tree Board should ensure that its members keep their knowledge of trees and related subjects up to date so they may be of valuable assistance to the community. Such knowledge can include but is not limited to:

The Tree Board can keep the knowledge of its members current in many ways:

3. Develop Support For An Urban Forestry Program

Development of an urban forestry program requires long-term planning (anywhere from 5 to 25 years or more). It also requires a significant amount of resources to implement. Stillwater, like most cities, is not able to support such a program by monetary means alone. This does not mean that an urban forestry program cannot be established in the community. It means that Stillwater must rely on the motivation and creativity of it's citizens to develop additional means of supporting the program. The Tree Board has already demonstrated, through it's Pioneer Grove planting project, that the citizens of Stillwater are eager to do so. The following three objectives and associated strategies will help the Tree Board build support for the urban forestry program throughout the community:

Considerations for accomplishing these goals are discussed in the section entitled Implementation.

IMPLEMENTATION

The previous section discussed the three main goals that the Stillwater Tree Board has set for itself: development of a tree management program, providing educational information, and developing support for an urban forestry program. All three are highly interconnected. For example, planting projects will attract community volunteers, furthering the tree management program, while simultaneously building community networks. Tree Board members, volunteers, and the community as a whole will learn from the experience.

Organizing volunteer networks throughout the community and building other support systems for an urban forestry program takes a considerable amount of time. Providing education to tree board members and the community is an ongoing process. The Tree Board and its volunteers should therefore focus initial efforts on developing a sound tree management program. A tree management program will provide two important functions:

  • It will prevent further deterioration of Stillwater's community forest (see Introduction)
    • new trees will be planted and maintained for long-term health
    • the health of existing trees will be improved through overdue maintenance which will extend their life span
  • It will provide a foundation from which the other two goals can be built upon
    • planting and maintenance projects can utilize volunteer help which will facilitate the building of networks and will also provide hands-on education for the community
    • volunteers will disseminate information and excitement which will further develop networks and support

THE TREE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
A tree management program should set goals for the three basic needs of the community forest: planting, maintenance, and removal. Annual work plans that outline tasks to accomplish these goals, and associated budgets, should be documented in Annual Operational Plans. Suggested goals for initiating a tree management program for Stillwater's community forest are discussed below. Annual operational plans are also suggested, and are structured to accomplish the initial phase within a five year period. Cost estimates for developing annual operational plans are difficult to determine, but are quite high. Estimates vary widely depending on whether work is done in-house or is contracted, size and species of trees involved, amount of work required, amount of work accomplished through monetary means versus volunteer means, and many more factors. The following assumptions were made in development of the annual budgets below:

  • Estimates are based upon information about planting, removal, and maintenance requirements obtained from the 1991 street tree inventory (see Introduction). They therefore only apply to initiating a program in the area inventoried (initial plan). They can be extended to include the entire Stillwater area once it has been inventoried (see Goals and Objectives).
  • Estimates are based upon the assumption that all tree work will be accomplished through monetary means. Much of the planting and some of the maintenance work can be accomplished through volunteer support. Tree removal is best handled by professionals and will require the highest amount of monetary support.

Removals:
As discussed in the Introduction, Stillwater's community forest is in a state of decline. Many trees have died or have declined to a hazardous state (condition rating of 30 percent or less in the tree inventory) due to old age and/or lack of maintenance. These trees need to be removed for safety and aesthetic reasons. Dead trees need to be removed immediately, and hazardous trees should be removed on a planned schedule thereafter. The total number of trees that need to be removed are shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Total Trees to be Removed
TREE SIZE # DEAD TREES # HAZARDOUS TREES TOTAL # TREES
< 24" 42 207 249
24" TO 36" 9 87 96
> 36" 2 10 12
TOTALS: 53 304 357

Removal of dead and hazardous trees is a continual process, and should be accompanied with replacement plantings. Proper maintenance of existing trees will slow the amount of removals needed in the future.

Planting:
Many spaces are available for tree planting. Planting projects should emphasize species diversification, and should aim to have each species comprise no more than 10 percent of the total tree population. They should also aim to plant at least the same number of trees that are removed. This will help ensure that the community forest is continually rejuvenated. It is critical that proper planting locations be identified since interference with utility lines is the foremost general maintenance and safety problem. Public educational programs are essential to reducing this conflict.

Available planting spaces originate from three sources: spaces in existence at the time of inventory, spaces created by removal of dead trees, and spaces created by removal of hazardous trees. Table 2 below shows the number of planting spaces that will be available throughout the five year initiation period.

Table 2

Total Trees to be Planted
SPACE ORIGIN # DEAD TREES
DEAD TREE REMOVALS 53
HAZARDOUS TREE REMOVALS 304
CURRENTLY AVAILABLE SPACES 5,295
TOTAL: 5,652

Maintenance:
Urban tree maintenance includes watering the first few years after planting and during dry seasons, pruning for strong structure and to remove deadwood, spraying for insects and/or disease when needed, and fertilizing when needed. A comprehensive maintenance schedule extends the life and improves the safety of urban trees. The inventory indicates that Stillwater's community forest has not been properly maintained. Almost 75 percent of the trees inventoried have not had deadwood removed, and almost 50 percent of the trees have been improperly pruned. Over 11 percent are interfering with utility lines which poses a considerable hazard. Maintenance should begin immediately after trees are planted and should continue throughout the life of the trees.

ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PLANS
Following are suggested annual operational plans for initiating a tree management program in Stillwater over a five-year period. Each annual plan outlines work objectives and associated budgets for the year. The costs used in the tables are estimates as such costs vary widely depending on several factors: tree type, size, location, health, and more. Removal costs are supplied by the Stillwater Parks and Recreation Department. Planting and maintenance costs are supplied by Cox Landscape Company Inc. (a private landscape company in Tulsa), and provide for the planting of a 2-inch balled and burlapped tree with complete maintenance (watering, pruning, spraying and fertilizing) of the tree for 2 years following planting. The estimate provided by this company was used to determine annual budgets since it seems to be the only local organization that could provide a representative cost per tree for both planting and maintenance. Stump removal costs were determined using an estimate of $3 per inch in diameter (taken from "Removing Stumps", Grounds Maintenance, 1991). One representative diameter from each size category was used to calculate stump removal costs: 24 inches, 30 inches, and 36 inches.

Year 1:
The primary objective for year 1 should be to remove all of the dead trees and fill the spaces created with replacement trees. This would mean that 53 trees would be removed and the same number of replacement trees would be planted. In addition, trees should be planted in currently available spaces. The annual plan provides for filling 1,059 currently available spaces. This number was determined by dividing the total number of available planting spaces by 5 years so that the same number of spaces are filled each year

Table 3

Dead Tree Removals (yr. 1)
TREE SIZE # TREES REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE) STUMP RMVL ($ PER TREE) TOTAL COST ($)
< 24" 42 250 72 13,524
24" to 36" 9 350 90 3,960
> 36" 2 750 108 1,716
TOTALS: 53     19,200

Table 4

Plantings (yr. 1)
SPACE ORIGIN # TREES COST PER TREE ($) TOTAL COST ($)
Dead Tree Removal 53 175 9,275
Available Spaces 1,059 175 185,325
TOTALS: 1,112   194,600

Table 5

Total Costs for Year 1
REMOVAL COSTS $19,200
PLANTING COSTS 194,600
TOTAL: $213,800

Year 2:
Objectives for year two should be to start removal of hazardous trees, plant in spaces created by these removals, and fill more currently available planting spaces. The tree inventory defines hazardous trees as those with a condition rating between 5 and 30 percent. A rating of 0 percent indicates the tree is dead while a condition rating of 100 percent indicates the tree is in the best possible health and condition. Hazardous tree removals for this year include those with a condition rating of 5 to 15 percent since these could be viewed as the most hazardous. According to tree inventory data, 35 trees fall into this category. The resulting operational plan for year 2 is shown in the following tables.

Table 6

Hazardous Tree Removals (yr. 2)
TREE SIZE # TREES REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE) STUMP RMVL. ($ PER TREE) TOTAL COST ($)
< 24" 22 250 72 7,084
24" to 36" 11 350 90 4,840
> 36" 2 750 108 1,716
TOTALS: 35     13,640

Table 7

Plantings (yr. 2)
SPACE ORIGIN # TREES COST PER TREE ($) TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls 35 175 6,125
Available Spaces 1,059 175 185,325
TOTALS: 1,195   191,450

Table 8

Total Costs for Year 2
REMOVAL COSTS $13,640
PLANTING COSTS $191,450
TOTAL: $205,090

Year 3:
Objectives for year 3 are to remove more of the hazardous trees, plant in spaces created by these removals, and fill more currently available spaces. Hazardous tree removals for this year include those with a condition rating of 20 to 25 percent. A total of 76 trees fall into this category. Therefore, 76 replacement trees will be planted as well as 1,059 to fill more available spaces. Operational plans for this year are shown in the following tables.

Table 9

Hazardous Tree Removals (yr. 3)
TREE SIZE # TREES REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE) STUMP REMOVAL ($ PER TREE) TOTAL COST ($)
< 24" 55 250 72 17,710
24" to 36" 14 350 90 6,160
> 36" 7 750 108 6,006
TOTALS: 76     29,876

Table 10

Plantings (yr. 3)
SPACE ORIGIN # TREES COST PER TREE ($) TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls 76 175 13,300
Available Spaces 1,059 175 185,325
TOTALS: 1,134   198,625

Table 11

Total Costs for Year 3
REMOVAL COSTS $29,876
PLANTING COSTS $198,625
TOTAL: $228,501

Year 4:
Objectives for year 4 should be to continue removal of hazardous trees, replacement of trees removed, and filling of available planting spaces. Hazardous removals include 97 trees with a condition rating of 30 percent. The resulting annual plan is shown in the following tables.

Table 12

Hazardous Tree Removals (yr. 4)
TREE SIZE # TREES REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE) STUMP REMOVAL ($ PER TREE) TOTAL COST ($)
< 24" 95 250 72 30,590
24" to 36" 0 350 90 0
> 36" 2 750 108 1,716
TOTALS: 97     32,306

Table 13

Plantings (yr. 4)
SPACE ORIGIN # TREES COST PER TREE ($) TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls 97 175 16,975
Available Spaces 1,059 175 185,325
TOTALS: 1,132   202,300

Table 14

Total Costs for Year 4
REMOVAL COSTS $32,306
PLANTING COSTS $202,300
TOTAL: $234,606

Year 5:
Objectives for the final year are to finish removal of the hazardous trees, to replace those trees removed, and to finish planting trees in available spaces. Hazardous removals include 96 trees left with a condition rating of 30 percent. Once again, 1,059 trees will be planted to fill the remaining available spaces. The annual plan for year 5 is summarized in the tables below.

Table 15

Hazardous Tree Removals (yr. 5)
TREE SIZE # TREES REMOVAL COST ($ PER TREE) STUMP REMOVAL ($ PER TREE) TOTAL COST ($)
< 24" 26 250 72 8,372
24" to 36" 70 350 90 30,800
> 36" 0 750 108 0
TOTALS: 96     39,172

Table 16

Plantings (yr. 5)
SPACE ORIGIN # TREES COST PER TREE ($) TOTAL COST ($)
Hazardous Rmvls 96 175 16,800
Available Spaces 1,059 175 185,325
TOTALS: 1,132   202,125

Table 17

Total Costs for Year 5
REMOVAL COSTS $39,172
PLANTING COSTS $202,125
TOTAL: $241,297

SUMMARY OF ANNUAL OPERATIONAL PLANS
Summaries of the annual budgets, annual work plans, and hazardous tree removals are provided in Tables 18 through 20.

Table 18

Summary of Annual Budgets ($)
COST TYPE YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTALS
REMOVALS 19,200 13,640 29,876 32,306 39,172 134,194
PLANTINGS 194,600 191,450 198,625 202,300 202,125 989,100
YR TOTALS 213,800 205,090 228,501 234,606 241,297 1,123,294

Annual work plans were structured to create annual budgets that would increase with each year. This would provide time to develop the necessary monetary and volunteer support for the urban forestry program. Objectives for each yearly operational plan are summarized in table 19 below.

Table 19

Summary of Annual Work Plans
  YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTALS
REMOVALS           357
Dead 53 0 0 0 0 53
Hazardous 0 35 76 97 96 304
TOTALS: 53 35 76 97 96 357
             
PLANTINGS            
Replacement 53 35 76 97 96 357
Available 1,059 1,059 1,059 1,059 1,059 5,295
TOTALS: 1,112 1,094 1,135 1,156 1,155 5,652

The most important objective for the initial tree management program is to create a safer community forest. All dead trees found during the inventory are therefore removed during the first year. All hazardous trees (those given a condition rating of 5 to 30 percent during the inventory) are removed throughout the remaining 4 years. The same number of trees that are removed are replaced each year to ensure continuation of the community forest. Available spaces are also filled each year to expand the community forest. A summary of the hazardous tree removals are shown in table 20.

Table 20

Summary of Hazardous Removals
  YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 TOTALS
CONDITION (%) 5 - 15 20 - 25 30 30
< 24" 22 55 95 26 198
24" TO 36" 11 14 0 70 95
> 36" 2 7 2 0 11
TOTALS: 35 76 97 96 304

Trees with the lowest condition rating can be considered the `most' hazardous. Hazardous removals therefore start with the lowest rated trees and successively remove higher rated trees the following years. Objectives for years 4 and 5 are to remove all trees with a condition rating of 30 percent. Removals for each of these years were structured to create the yearly increase in the overall budget for the initial 5 year program (see Summary of Annual Budgets above).

Created by Wendy Robinson